Tuesday, November 17, 2015

HL Paper 1 - Structure and Introduction

Commentary Structure
Paragraphs 1 and 6 are the conclusion and introduction.

Paragraph 2-Audience and Purpose:
·         Text 1 from the 20’s, text 2 from the 2000’s-difference in audience and their mentalities.
·         Audience is the same- Wealthy people who use “exotic” islands as a vacation. With that being said, their purpose is different:
o   Text 1: Encouraging people to travel to these places for a vacation, exotifying the islands and encouraging people to go on vacations.
o   Text 2: Discouraging heavy vacationing, making these “exotic” places seem like homes instead of vacation spots.
·         Colonial vs. postcolonial lens.

Paragraph 3- Content and Theme:
·         Text 1:
o   “The Great White Fleet” has summer trips that go from New York to countries such as Panama, Cuba, and Jamaica.
o   It’s targeting a high class that goes on vacations like this usually.
o   Theme- Using a certain luxurious lifestyle to sell a product.
·         Text 2:
o   Squatters vs. Developers.
o   Emphasizes the idea that there is a competition between people who have homes in the “vacation spot” of other people.
o   While text 1 sells the idea that these places are exotic, text 2 shows them as homes that should not be considered vacation spots.

Paragraph 4- Tone and Mood:
·         Different tones in the sense that text 1 is very happy and enthusiastic in order to sell their idea while text 2 shows it in a very bad and detrimental light.
·         Text 1: In regard to the people that live there , they are very disregarded. The high class is treated well.
·         Text 2: There is a sense of pity when talking about the squatters. When talking about the developers, there is a sense of annoyance.

Paragraph 5 - Stylistic Features:
·         Advertisement vs. Article- both still used to sell an idea.
·         Text 1- Uses visual and pictorial imagery.
·         Text 2- Uses literary imagery.
·         Both using glittering generalities, plain folks, and manipulation.
·         Explain the visual devices in text 1 (font, color, pictures).

(Main ideas- Compare between audience and some stylistic feuatures, contrast between tone, purpose, and theme). 


Introduction: 

While many issues have stayed the same over many years, the way they are viewed has greatly differed. Text 1 is an advertisement from 1922 from a steamship company that is advertising their annual trips to "exotic" places like Panama and Cuba. Text 2 is an article from the Miami Herald in 2007 that discourages heavy vacationing and "developing" in the Caribbean Islands because of the poor living standards for people living there. Considering that text 2 is almost 90 years after text 1, it is clear that they will both have different viewpoints when it comes to this topic. While they both target the same audience, text 1 seems to encourage the audience while text 2 seems to discourage them. Comparing them from a post colonial vs. colonial point of view then puts these two texts in context. While both texts target the same audience and refer to the Caribbean Islands, text 1 encourages the audience to look at these places in an overly exotified and luxurious manner in order to sell their product all through a colonial lens while text 2 takes a postcolonial perspective in order to downgrade the worth and extravagance of these “vacation spots” and discourage the developers in looking at these places as uninhabited and exclusive by using imagery to evoke an emotion of sympathy for the squatters.

4 comments:

  1. you have clearly identified the comparisons and contrasts for each text in your introduction- my question is maybe your putting to much information on the comparing and contrasting because you are stating all the points in the discussion below. This information would be great for the conclusion. You have done very well on establishing the why- your thesis is really good

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really enjoyed reading this outline, Amirah! You fulfilled all the ACTS criteria and placed both texts in context and identified the main elements that are going to be compared. Maybe you can make a note on the tone and mood within the introduction and make a comment on how they clearly differ considering that they are going to be conveying different purposes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Overall I think this a great introduction. You've clearly identified both text types and their content. You've also referred back to ACTS criteria. However, I feel like you could be more effective in your delivery here. You should summarize each of your ACTS criteria in 1 sentence for each text, with the 'so what?'. There are instances where you drift off for a bit and its not really clear. Also, your first line is a little too vague. Try putting it into context of the texts and their common theme. Your thesis is great and grounded in your theme. You do have a constant comparison throughout.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very well written outline so grounds all the information that is needed for your paper one. You provide very good points and show effective comparative elements being portrayed. Maybe include briefly how the style and structure of having a poster vs a article has an influence. Overall, really well written introduction, well done!

    ReplyDelete