Stream of
consciousness is a technique used by the writer to show inside the mind of the main
character. In The Thief and the Dogs, the readers are exposed to the twisted
mind of the main character, Said. Mahfouz uses stream of consciousness as a way
to develop the main character and the overall theme of the novel. When going
inside Said’s head, the reader is able to understand the theme of revenge and
hatred on a level that could not simply be understood through the narration.
From the first page of the novel, the change in text to italics signals the
beginning of Saids thoughts. Throughout the novel, italics are used to go
inside Said’s head. Being released from jail marks his quest for hate fueled revenge.
It is important to know that the original book in Arabic did not have italics.
The English translation then used the italics to switch from indirect to direct
monologue, thus enriching the stream of consciousness present in the novel. Through
being able to go in his head, the reader is able to sympathize with Said. With
that being said, it’s difficult not to question Said’s sanity. . The stream-of-
consciousness technique used in “The Thief and The Dogs,” is generally
different then Naguib Mahfouz’s other work- which tends to be grounded in a
more realistic fiction idea.
The book is
very fast paced and switches between several types of narration throughout. The
most commonly used form of narration is indirect narration. Soliloquys and direct
narration are italicized throughout then novel and go into Said’s thoughts
directly. There are abrupt shifts in narration. Throughout the novel, it is
clear that Said’s thoughts are evolving as he becomes more fueled by anger and
hatred. There is a shift in tone after Said’s daughter rejects him. The
narration switches to indirect right after he is rejected and it is clear that
it marks the time that Said loses a part of his sanity. His thoughts switch
from hatred and turn into anger and a desire of revenge. The one thing that
kept him sane was the thought of his daughter and the loss of that drives him
over the edge.
When the reader
is able to psychologically understand Said, they are able to understand his
external problems that contributed to his internal struggle, thus helping the
reader understand this revolutionary counter narrative and the flawed society
that Mahfouz is writing about. Because it was a heavy time of censorship,
Mahfouz used his characters crazed mind to skillfully explain the problems that
he is facing. As Said’s thoughts become more irrational, the reader crafts an
idea of his external struggles. In this way, Mahfouz used Said’s internal thoughts
as a social commentary of the post-revolution Egypt.
With this
all being said, several problems arise when and author decides to use a stream
of consciousness technique. Firstly, a decay of plot is possible because writers
become so entangled in the thoughts and experiences of the character that they
often forget to complete a plot. Secondly, the character itself becomes so
tangled in the deep psychological thoughts that the writer often disregards the
outward appearance that the character is. The writer often believes that the
most inner thoughts of the character is impossible to depict to the outside reader,
often causing a clash of thoughts in the writer. When these things change, the
theme then will change as a result and will lose its meaning.
Overall, Mahfouz
revolutionized Arab writing through his use of the stream of consciousness in
The Thief and the Dogs.
Amirah-- I found your blog post to be very insightful. However, I disagree with your statement that "because writers become so entangled in the thoughts and experiences of the character that they often forget to complete a plot." This statement carries the assumptions that 1) the thoughts and experiences of the character is secondary to plot development in terms of importance, and 2) a focus on plot is necessary for a novel. I believe that, in the case of Mahfouz, his focus on Said may come at the expense of plot-- but this is deliberate. He did not "forget" anything in my opinion. And even with the stream of consciousness technique the novel is still fast paced and exciting.
ReplyDeleteYasmin, although I believe that some authors can lose the plot due to a heavy focus on the stream of consciousness, I do agree with the fact that Mahfouz's focus on the stream of consciousness and Said's thoughts actually was essential to the development of the plot - and did allow it to be fast paced and allowed for a novel that developed with each page.
DeleteThis is a very insightful Blog Post Amirah! I do agree on your argument that authors can be susceptible to ignoring plot development when they are focused on depicting the characters thoughts and emotions. However, I do not believe Mahfouz provided evidence for this susceptibility in The Thief and the Dogs, how do do you think he was still able to achieve a clear plot?
ReplyDeleteGood job on your post Amirah! I enjoyed your insightful response; especially in the first paragraph when you related Mahfouz's style of writing with the theme as the theme of this novel is very important and furthermore, it is something we haven't discussed in class yet. Also, I like your connection between psychological understanding of terms and phrases due to the heavy censorship present at the time. Do you believe that if the censorship wasn't present at the time, his choice of diction would have been different?
ReplyDelete